Difference between revisions of "Triadic Restructuring (TR)"

From Psychotherapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Goals of Restructuring:)
(Additional References)
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
 
== Definition: ==
 
== Definition: ==
  
Triadic Restructuring (TR) is a method of restructuring or re-patterning that encompasses an array of techniques which occur in three-person and larger systems. Thus, TR utilizes techniques which alter process, structure, hierarchy, and function of  triads and family systems at domain Level III (triadic-relational) of the total ecological system. Viewing the system using an increasingly macroscopic lens, TR techniques tend to focus on dyads which are unstable having engaged a third-person to stabilize the dyad. Whereas, DR is concerned with self-other configurations, TR emphasizes a dyad + another. These techniques are primarily derived from family systems approaches but may also be used individually. Triangular configurations may exist in multiple configurations, both generationally and muti-generationally.
+
Triadic Restructuring (TR) is a method of [[restructuring]] or re-patterning that encompasses an array of techniques which occur in three-person and larger systems. Thus, TR utilizes techniques which alter process, structure, hierarchy, and function of  triads and family systems at domain Level III (triadic-relational) of the total ecological system. Viewing the system using an increasingly macroscopic lens, TR techniques tend to focus on dyads which are unstable having engaged a third-person to stabilize the dyad. Whereas, DR is concerned with self-other configurations, TR emphasizes a dyad + another. These techniques are primarily derived from family systems approaches but may also be used individually. Triangular configurations may exist in multiple configurations, both generationally and muti-generationally.
  
 
== Function: ==  
 
== Function: ==  
The function of triadic restructuring is to enhance the self-other differentiation in a dyadic configuration where there is a lack of intimacy and closeness, or an avoidance of conflict that results in the necessity for a third party to stabilize this configuration  (Guerin et al., 1996, p. 56).[1]
+
The function of triadic restructuring is to enhance the self-other differentiation in a dyadic configuration where there is a lack of intimacy and closeness, or an avoidance of conflict that results in the necessity for a third party to stabilize this configuration  (Guerin et al., 1996, p. 56).<ref>Guerin, P. J., Fogarty, T. F., Fay, L. F., & Kautto, J. G. (1996). ''Working with relational triangles: The one-two-three of psychotherapy''. New York: Guilford Press</ref>
  
 
== Goals of Restructuring: ==
 
== Goals of Restructuring: ==
Line 20: Line 20:
 
'''Subtypes of Triadic Restructuring:'''  
 
'''Subtypes of Triadic Restructuring:'''  
 
*[[Relational Triadic Restructuring]]: focus on three-person relationships in vivo  
 
*[[Relational Triadic Restructuring]]: focus on three-person relationships in vivo  
*[[Symbolic-relational restructuring]]: focus on individual or dynamics in triad not physically present  
+
*[[Symbolic-relational restructuring]]: focus on individual or dynamics in triad not physically present
+
*[[Enactment]]: key moments in treatment that involve three person interactions that are typical yet can be used to intervene to create new possibilities
[edit] References
+
1.↑ Guerin, P. J., Fogarty, T. F., Fay, L. F., & Kautto, J. G. (1996). Working with relational triangles: The one-two-three of psychotherapy. New York: Guilford Press.
+
2.↑ Fogarty, T. (1979). The distancer and the pursuer. The Family, 7(1), 11-16.
+
3.↑ Guerin, P. J., Fogarty, T. F., Fay, L. F., & Kautto, J. G. (1996). Working with relational triangles: The one-two-three of psychotherapy. New York: Guilford Press.
+
4.↑ Guerin, P. J., Fogarty, T. F., Fay, L. F., & Kautto, J. G. (1996). Working with relational triangles: The one-two-three of psychotherapy. New York: Guilford Press.
+
  
 
== References ==
 
== References ==
  
 
<references/>
 
<references/>
 +
 +
 +
== Additional References ==
 +
 +
Fogarty, T. (1979). The distancer and the pursuer. ''The Family, 7''(1), 11-16.

Latest revision as of 11:19, 1 May 2011

Triadic Restructuring (TR) is the Triadic-relational configurations Substrate


Definition:

Triadic Restructuring (TR) is a method of restructuring or re-patterning that encompasses an array of techniques which occur in three-person and larger systems. Thus, TR utilizes techniques which alter process, structure, hierarchy, and function of triads and family systems at domain Level III (triadic-relational) of the total ecological system. Viewing the system using an increasingly macroscopic lens, TR techniques tend to focus on dyads which are unstable having engaged a third-person to stabilize the dyad. Whereas, DR is concerned with self-other configurations, TR emphasizes a dyad + another. These techniques are primarily derived from family systems approaches but may also be used individually. Triangular configurations may exist in multiple configurations, both generationally and muti-generationally.

Function:

The function of triadic restructuring is to enhance the self-other differentiation in a dyadic configuration where there is a lack of intimacy and closeness, or an avoidance of conflict that results in the necessity for a third party to stabilize this configuration (Guerin et al., 1996, p. 56).[1]

Goals of Restructuring:

The goal of triadic restructuring is to alter the processes that occur in three-person configurations which can be depicted as triads.

  • Subtypes of Triadic Restructuring:
  1. Relational Triadic Restructuring: focus on three-person relationships in vivo
  2. Symbolic-relational restructuring: focus on individual or dynamics in triad not physically present

Methods & Techniques:

Subtypes of Triadic Restructuring:

References

  1. Guerin, P. J., Fogarty, T. F., Fay, L. F., & Kautto, J. G. (1996). Working with relational triangles: The one-two-three of psychotherapy. New York: Guilford Press


Additional References

Fogarty, T. (1979). The distancer and the pursuer. The Family, 7(1), 11-16.