View source for Neo-Freudian

The '''Neo-Freudian''' [[psychiatrists]] and [[psychology|psychologists]] were a group of loosely linked American theorists of the mid-twentieth century, who were all influenced by [[Sigmund Freud]], but who extended his theories, often in social or cultural directions.  They have been defined as 'American writers who attempted to restate Freudian theory in sociological terms and to eliminate its connections with biology'<ref>Charles Rycroft, ''A Critical Dictionary of Psychoanalysis'' (London 1995) p. 60</ref>. First, the Neo-Freudian was born in Germany ("neopsychoanalyse") (1945) by the german psychiatrist [[Harald Schultz-Hencke]] <ref>Geoffrey Cocks : ''Psychotherapy in the Third Reich'', Publisher: Transaction Publishers; 2 edition (January 1, 1997), ISBN 1560009047</ref>. 

==Dissidents and Post-Freudians==

The term Neo-Freudian is sometimes loosely (but inaccurately) used to cover those early followers of Freud who at some point accepted the basic tenets of Freud's theory of [[psychoanalysis]] but later dissented from it. 'The best-known of these dissenters are [[Alfred Adler]] and [[Carl Jung|Jung]]...The Dissidents'<ref>Eric Berne, ''A Layman's Guide to Psychiatry and Psychoanalysis'' (Middlesex 1976) p. 277 and p. 298</ref>.

The '[[British Independent Group (psychoanalysis)|Independent Analysts' Group]] of the British Psycho-Analytical Society, as distinct from the Kleinians and what are now called the Contemporary Freudians'<ref>Patrick Casement, ''Further Learning from the Patient'' (London 1996) p. 177n</ref>, who include figures such as [[Christopher Bollas]], [[D. W. Winnicott]] and [[Adam Phillips]], are - like the [[Ego psychology|ego-psychologists]] such as [[Heinz Hartmann]] or the intersubjectivist analysts in the States - perhaps best considered of as 'different schools of psychoanalytic thought'<ref>John H. Padel, "Freudianism: Later Developments" in Richard Gregory ed, ''The Oxford Companion to the Mind'' (Oxford 1987) p. 270</ref>, or as 'Post-Freudians...post-Freudian developments'<ref>Jean-Michel Quinodox, ''Reading Freud'' (London 2005) p, ix</ref>.

It was only in a jocular, derogative way that one might have spoken in the Eighties of 'today's ''nouvelle vague'' neo-Freudians, [[Otto Kernberg|Kernberg]] and [[Heinz Kohut|Kohut]]'<ref>Janet Malcolm, ''Psychoanalysis: The Impossible Profession'' (London 1988) p.28</ref>.

==Neo-Freudian Ideas==

An interest in the social approach to psychodynamics was the major theme linking the so-called Neo-Freudians.  Adler had perhaps been 'the first to explore and develop a comprehensive social theory of the psychodynamic self'<ref>Paul Brinich/Christopher Shelley, ''The Self and Personality Structure'' (Buckingham 2002) p. 61 </ref>; and 'after Adler's death, some of his views...came to exert considerable influence on neo-Freudian theory'<ref>O. Zangwill, "Freud", in Gregory, ''Mind'' p. 269</ref>: indeed, it has been suggested of 'Horney and Sullivan...that these theorists could be more accurately described as "neo-Adlerians" than "neo-Freudians"'<ref>Brinich, ''Self'' p. 54</ref>.

As early as 1932, however, Fromm had been independently regretting that psychoanalysts 'did not concern themselves with the variety of life experience...and therefore did not try to explain psychic structure as determined by social structure'<ref>Quoted in Adam Phillips, ''On Flirtation'' (London 1994) p. 132</ref>.

Horney too 'emphasised the role culture exerts in the development of personality and downplayed the classical driven features outlined by Freud'<ref>Brinich, ''Self'' p. 61</ref>.

Erikson for his part stressed that 'psychoanalysis today is...shifting its emphasis...to the study of the ego's roots in social organisation', and that its method should be 'what H. S. Sullivan called "participant", and systematically so'<ref>Erik H. Erikson, ''Childhood and Society'' (Middlesex 1973) p. 13-4</ref>.

Harald Schultz-Hencke (1892-1953), doctor and psychotherapist, was busy thoroughly with questions like impulse and inhibition and with the therapy of psychoses as well as the interpretation of dreams. He was agains't the libido freudian theory and also working with Prof. [[Matthias Göring]] in he's institut (Deutsches Institut für psychologische Forschung und Psychotherapie). He created the name "neopsychoanalyse" in 1945 <ref>[[Alain de Mijolla]] ''International Dictionary of Psychoanalysis'', 3 Vol., Publisher: Macmillan Reference USA; 1 edition (July 21, 2005), ISBN 0028659279</ref>.

The 'Neo-Freudian revolt against the orthodox theory of instincts' was thus anchored in a sense of what Sullivan termed '"our incredibly culture-ridden life"'<ref>Martin Birnbach, ''Neo-Freudian Social Philosophy'' (Stanford 1961) p. 50</ref>. By their writings, and 'in accessible prose, Fromm, Horney, and others mounted a cultural and social critique which became almost conventional wisdom'<ref>Russell Jacoby, ''The Repression of Psychoanalysis: Otto Fenichel and the Political Freudians'' (Chicago 1986) p. 153</ref>.

Through informal and more formal institutional links, such as the [[William Alanson White Institute]], as well as through likeness of ideas, the Neo-Freudians made up a cohesively distinctive and influential psychodynamic movement.

==Criticism==

'[[Otto Fenichel|Fenichel]] developed a stringent theoretical critique of the neo-Freudians'<ref>Jacoby, ''Otto Fenichel and the political Freudians'' p. 153</ref>, which informed and fed into the way '[[Herbert Marcuse]], in his "Critique of Neo-Freudian Revisionism"...icily examines the tone of uplift and the Power of Positive Thinking that pervades the revisionists' writings, and mocks their claims to scientific seriousness'<ref>Malcolm, ''Impossible'' p. 28</ref>.

In comparable fashion, 'an article...by Mr [[Edward Glover (psychoanalyst)|Edward Glover]], entitled ''Freudian or Neo-Freudian'', directed entirely against the constructions of Mr Alexander'<ref>Jacques Lacan, ''The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis'' (London 1994) p. 174</ref> equally used the term as a form of orthodox reproach.

In the wake of such contemporary criticism, a 'consistent critique levelled at most theorists cited above is that they compromise the intrapersonal interiority of the psyche'; but one may accept nonetheless that 'they have contributed an enduring and vital collection of standpoints relating to the human subject'<ref>Brinich, ''Self'' p. 66</ref>.

==Influence and Successors==

In 1940, [[Carl Rogers]] had launched what would become [[person-centered psychotherapy]], 'crediting its roots in the therapy of [[Otto Rank|Rank]]...& in the neo-Freudian analysts - especially Karen Horney'<ref>Howard Kirschenbaum, ''The Life and Work of Carl Rogers'' (Ross-on-Wye 2007) p. 109</ref>.  A decade later, he would report that it had 'developed along somewhat different paths than the psychotherapeutic views of Horney or Sullivan, or Alexander and French, yet there are many threads of interconnection with these modern formulations of psychoanalytic thinking'<ref>Rogers, quoted in Kirschenbaum, ''Rogers'' p. 279</ref>.

A half-century further on, whether by direct or by indirect influence, 'consistent with the traditions of these schools, current theorists of the social and psychodynamic self are working in the spaces between social and political theory and psychoanalysis (Wolfenstein 1993; Chodorow 1994; Hinshelwood 1996)'<ref>Brinich, ''Self'' p. 66</ref> once again.

==Cultural Offshoots==

In his skit on Freud's remark that 'if my name were Oberhuber, my innovations would have found far less resistance'<ref>Quoted in Peter Gay, ''Reading Freud''  (London 1990) p. 160</ref>, [[Peter Gay]], considering the notional eclipse of "Oberhuber" by his replacement Freud, adjudged that 'the prospect that deviants would have to be called neo-Oberhuberians, or Oberhuberian revisionists, contributed to the master's decline'<ref>Gay, p. 163</ref>.

==Neo-Freudians==

*  Harald Schultz-Hencke * [[Erik Erikson]] *  [[Karen Horney]] *  [[Erich Fromm]] *  [[Frieda Fromm-Reichmann]] *  [[Harry Stack Sullivan]] *  [[Clara Thompson]] * [[Psychological anthropology|Abram Kardiner]]

==Others with Possible Neo-Freudian Links==
*  [[Jessica Benjamin]] *  [[Nancy Chodorow]] *  [[Richard Hakim]] *  [[Thomas Ogden]] *  [[David Rapaport]] * [[Alex Unger]] * [[Mark Blechner]] * [[Franz Alexander]] * T. M. French

==References==

<references/>

==Related publications==
* Thompson, Clara M. (1950). ''Psychoanalysis: Evolution and development''. New York: Thomas Nelson & Sons. 

* Mitchell, S.A., & Black M.J. (1995). ''Freud and beyond: a history of modern psychoanalytic thought.'' USA: Basic Books.